Brother of the Hawk

Joined

• started 10 topics
• posted 277 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Brother of the Hawk

• 
  14

  1969 Kingdom Ministry PDF

  by cabasilas in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  for those interested in collecting the pdfs of the kingdom ministry for research purposes.. as is well known, the watchtower library cd-rom starts its coverage of kms in 1970. however, the kms from 1966 to 1969 show a bit more of the excitement relating to the prediction that 6,000 years of man's existence would run out in the year 1975.. the 1969 kingdom ministry (51 mb) can be downloaded here:.

  http://www.megaupload.com/?d=hrm4yyx7.

  the scans were done and shared by invetigator74.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lzbrt2bdom1nwu2/AABzOvmAIkUI0z9typl1kYh-a?dl=0
• 
  4

  KM PDF

  by naeuca in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  i'm trying to get hold of km's from the period from 1970 to 2009 and 2011. would anyone happen to have these in pdf that you can kindly send me please?.

  thanks so much in advance!!.

  naeuca.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lzbrt2bdom1nwu2/AABzOvmAIkUI0z9typl1kYh-a?dl=0
• 
  25

  I can't send any PM's thru this site.....

  by Newly Enlightened in

  1. forum
  2. tech-support

  hi simon, i can't send any pm's thru the sites email system.. please help!.

  kim.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  I have to use my husbands account because now I don't seem to be able to do posts. Yes, I tried uploading a screen shot and it won't post.

  Yes, I put a subject, I type out the message but the blue button is not working to send it
• 
  33

  Evolution, Biogeography VS. Experimental archaeology

  by Brother of the Hawk in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i thought of posting this on an ongoing thread regarding proof of noahs flood by poster *lost*, but i think a separate thread is needed.

  this is why.. first my disclaimer.

  this thread is a theory since so many people love the theory and so as not to hurt feelings and insult anyone, this is only a theory.. my personal observation is this, as long as you bash watchtower all is ok. as soon as you try to present any resemblance of christianity or any belief in the bible, such as the flood, you are personally bashed.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  adamah: Neither one of these terms are based in facts. The defintions sound the same to me. Is this the best you've got?

  Really?

  the·o·ry

  noun \ ' the-?-re, ' thir-e\ pluralthe·o·ries

  Definition of THEORY

  1 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another 2 : abstract thought :speculation 3 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art <music theory> 4 a: a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action <her method is based on the theory that all children want to learn> b: an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances —often used in the phrase in theory <in theory, we have always advocated freedom for all> 5 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena <the wave theory of light> 6 a: a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation b: an unproved assumption :conjecture c: a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject <theory of equations> Hypothesis:

  hy·poth·e·sis

  noun \hi- ' pä-th?-s?s\ pluralhy·poth·e·ses \- ? sez\

  Definition of HYPOTHESIS

  1 a:an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument

  b: an interpretation of a practical situation or condition taken as the ground for action 2 : a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences 3 : the antecedent clause of a conditional statement See hypothesis defined for English-language learners » See hypothesis defined for kids » Another example of someone not looking up what the terms mean....
• 
  64

  What was YOUR wake-up call before you left the JW´s organization?

  by Mr Fool in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what was your wake-up call(s) before you left the jw s organization?

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  Reasoning Book page 89 under the subheading 'Cross' then I went to the Imperial Bible Dictionary and looked up the quote directly, yep cherry-picking at its finest Brother of the Hawk
• 
  33

  Evolution, Biogeography VS. Experimental archaeology

  by Brother of the Hawk in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i thought of posting this on an ongoing thread regarding proof of noahs flood by poster *lost*, but i think a separate thread is needed.

  this is why.. first my disclaimer.

  this thread is a theory since so many people love the theory and so as not to hurt feelings and insult anyone, this is only a theory.. my personal observation is this, as long as you bash watchtower all is ok. as soon as you try to present any resemblance of christianity or any belief in the bible, such as the flood, you are personally bashed.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  I thought of posting this on an ongoing thread regarding “Proof of Noah’s flood” by poster *LOST*, but I think a separate thread is needed. This is why.

  First my disclaimer. This thread is a “THEORY” since so many people love “The THEORY” and so as not to hurt feelings and insult anyone, this is only a “THEORY.”

  My personal observation is this, as long as you bash Watchtower all is ok. As soon as you try to present any resemblance of Christianity or any belief in the bible, such as the flood, you are personally bashed. There is a certain group of posters who like to cyber bully, by telling the poster *lost* in her thread, “You can do all the research you want, just don’t post it here.” This behavior is childish and needs to be stopped because this type of behavior not only is “bullying,” but it shuts down dialog, conversation and creativity.

  Is this not what Watchtower does?

  By telling *lost* “You can do all the research you want, just don’t post it here” you are copying Watchtower and playing into their hands. You are killing free thinking because people are afraid to post, why does this group feel they have to shut down research and posting of such research? As an experimental archaeologist I could post a question that I am sure, without access to the internet, you cannot answer, that would be unfair to me because what you think is absolute, is not absolute.

  I thought The WTBTS was the only one who controlled the information, I guess I was wrong.

  I entered the thread with thought provoking questions, in fact I made the poster Cofty change his post regarding his statement about biogeography and all marsupials evolved in Australia, (southern hemisphere) well, that did not set well with him, and the next post He said “Now let me tell you about the opossum”. So Cofty I will get back to you in a bit. So you see, when you make a condescending statement like this, “I love discussing these topics but it would be refreshing to see some effort from the other side”, then at me personally “Is an experimental archaeologist somebody who finds fossils as a hobby and then makes stuff up? The gloves will come off. You see folks, there is a clear leader for all the cyber bullying and it is Cofty. I will be back to this in a minute.

  Next we come to MP and his post regarding his salt experiment. He asserted, without any thought, “Even if the world was covered in water, the land would have been salted and ruined.” Perhaps you forgot to think about the Hawaiian Islands, not only do they “Evolve” in the same salt you claimed would ruin the land, you also forgot to include, they are still “Evolving” by means of volcanic activity. But yet the Islands are full of life. And before you assert any time frame, check current data, this chain of Islands is continually being destroyed and reappearing by tectonic plate movement. Unlike some other islands that are a product of continental shifting these islands are not made that way. MP this will be the second time I have made you change your post.

  Now Comatose: After your insults, I hope you felt better. First, learn the difference between geologist and archaeologist; clearly you don’t know the difference. But regarding the fossil record I mentioned and how they were made, you asked me if I realized fossils don’t just form due to water? Why did you ask this question out of context? What does an insect in Amber fossils have to do with water and sediment made fossil? What does a dinosaur falling in a tar pit have to do with water and sediment making fossils? In order to keep it in context you must have meant to say. I do realize the wooly mammoth and the hairy Rhino, were flash frozen, in fact with green vegetation not only in the stomach but also in their mouths, which would indicate at time of death, (by instant freezing, a product of water) they were grazing and eating from trees, which I also realize the area must not have been covered by a polar cap, but must have been eating and grazing in a tropical type area. I do also realize that any animal, any type of animal would be capable of migrating to another area to avoid the tremendously slow moving glacier. I apologize for my ignorance.

  That’s ok Comatose; I just changed your post for you. BTW, you might just learn something from these links regarding how fossils are made, you will find a common method and how an extremely stroke of luck it would be to actually have fossils in tar pits and amber. But Ice and sediment are very common. And no longer is there any evidence of this happening since the flood, you see the conditions to make world wide sediment fossils no longer exist. http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/dinofossils/Fossilhow.html

  http://www.livescience.com/37781-how-do-fossils-form-rocks.html

  http://www.fossils-facts-and-finds.com/how_are_fossils_formed.h

  BTW everyone reading this thread, not at one time did anyone have the decency to ask me what an experimental archaeologist was, and what my field of study was? All the insults came with the assumption that they knew what it was. WRONG! Again, Bullying

  Now to you Cofty, The gloves are off. In the above mentioned thread, you made some very bold statements about biogeography, one of which I made you correct, I will do that again,

  Wait for it…

  I DID read about biogeography, in fact the link you posted. Then I went to Google and read all I could read. But I could nowhere find the language you asserted. You know what you asserted, so I don’t think I need to repost it. Well, while doing other research regarding Darwin, the evolution theory, and how they relate to the book of revelation, I found this little gem.

  http://creation.com/biogeography The link you posted from an evolution site proved to be very one- sided. THIS LINK presents BOTH SIDES! Please note the language you used, is used in this article. Your original assertion was all marsupials evolved in Australia. This article states while “most marsupials ended up in the southern hemisphere, (your assertion referring to marsupials evolving in Australia is incorrect), because the fossil record shows all marsupial are from the Americas. Your Lemur, that you asserted evolved in Madagascar, the fossil record shows they are from Africa. There is no fossil record of either species evolving in Australia or Madagascar. So your biogeography assertions are wrong.

  For those of you who wish to explore further the flood account, here are some links you might enjoy. Please, as you read them put them in proper context, of particular interest is the chart made from recent core samples from Greenland. And also please read the link regarding C-14 which is radiocarbon dating, it is NOT an accurate means of dating the earth. http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/

  http://www.specialtyinterests.net/carbon14.html

  OK Cofty now for the KO punch. Tell me why, for a person who posted your current illness did you turn to the very people you look down upon for comfort? Your actions are Hyprocritical! If you truly do believe in evolution and its theory, why are you not accepting the fact that evolution has selected you for termination, because you no longer fit the criteria of “survival of the fittest”! The conflict is truly yours, in opposition to evolution you try to extend your life. This is a prime example of what you assert, to those who contend with you. “ Intellectual dishonesty”!

  Brother of the Hawk
• 
  170

  Proof of Noah's Flood - Presently watching a Documentary about Europe & the Ice Age

  by *lost* in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  first time i ever heard anyone say there was 'proof' of noah's flood.. very interesting,.

  showed a trawler, where the team dredges regularly in the north sea - for animal bones, massive land animal bones, mammoths.. he said, originally, the bones were sent for analysis, and the dr stated, they were proof of noah's flood.. the north sea area was a land mass of dry grazing lands.

  and it was very similar to africa.. many bones were found in london, of lions, hippos, etc ... when they were digging out the underground.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  mp, nice trick. Before anything will begin to grow the next rain storm will have washed your experiment away. Life will grow, even on the side of sheer rock cliffs.

  Perry, nice picture, clouds area a water canopy. It is a very real living cycle of the earth. Does anyone know how a evaporative cooler works?

  And also explain how much water pressure would it take to turn a carbonbased life form and also how long under such pressure to turn it completely to stone? I am referring to the petrified trees in Arizona. To the best of my knowldege, trees have always grown on land. There is only one force of nature I can think of that would turn a living tree or a sea shell to stone. If anyone can figure the pressure involved and the depth of water it would take to do this, I would love to hear it.

  Cofty. I have not answered your question because I fail to see how it relates to the OP. I will agree the Earth is very old, Millions even billions, I have no problem with that.
• 
  6

  Jesus said " YOU are of your father the devil, He was a murderer ".

  by jam in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this may be a stupid question, but who did he kill?

  is called a murderer?

  i can not recall anywhere in the bible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  Doesn't the book of Job state Satan caused a wind storm that caused the death of Jobs children? God gave everything in Satans hand, but not Jobs life.

  I found this one account you are looking for. Job 1: 1-19

  Affectionately: Brother of the Hawk ( I will surrender my mind no more, forever)
• 
  32

  Need article about looking to the slave rather than Christ for salvation

  by Bonnie_Clyde in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i thought there was something recently.

  clyde says he needs it soon to show a friend, and i don't know where to find it.

  can i get it off jw.org ?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  Marked for the reference sources. I am prepairing to do my apostate video, and this is good material to use.
• 
  23

  Head Gasket Sorted - with pics

  by cofty in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  ok if you clicked on this you might be a mechanical geek like me.

  some people love buying shoes or handbags for me is shiny new tools.. for the last few weeks the head gasket has been blowing on my rover 214. fortunately the oil and water hasn't been mixing so no harm done.

  the combustion gases have been blowing through the water jacket which made it sounded like a witches cauldron.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Brother of the Hawk

  I spent 14 years as a heavy equipment mechanic, I also built race engines. I don't miss it at all. But the most fun I had with a car is when we had out MG Midget. Fun car though. I hated it when the twin Weber carbs went out of sinc.